Skip to main content

September 17 – Riverside City Council on Thursday evening approved a resolution that imposed a moratorium on increasing the city’s income tax credit for 10 years if voters passed a 1% tax hike. income currently being voted on in November.

Riverside currently does not have a tax credit for residents who work in another city. If voters approve the measure, the tax rate will drop from 1.5% with 50% credit given for taxes paid to other jurisdictions to 2.5% with 100% credit given, Chris Lohr said, interim city manager.

Half of the 1% income tax increase on the November poll will go to police operations in the city, and the other half will go to fire. The city says the increase in income tax is necessary because of the rising costs to the city, including health insurance and salaries.

The fire department, police department and firefighters union have publicly stated that they support the tax.

Two board members voted against the resolution, April Franklin and Bev Campbell.

Council member Brenda Fry said she believed the community had no problem reintroducing the tax credit, but worried about the process underway.

“I think the concern is that we have the power to affect their results and that they don’t have a say in this stuff,” Fry said, referring to the community. “I would agree more with a proposal where we say we will not increase credit without their consent.”

Mayor Pete Williams said he and Jesse Maxfield, the two city council members who proposed the resolution, had explored the option.

“I mean, General Counsel, correct me if I’m wrong, but I asked this question a month ago, that we basically put conditions on a moratorium and he said, it’s not in the charter, so we can’t change the charter, ”says Williams.

He said he believed this proposal was the best way to get around the problem.

“I’m trying to include the electorate and the citizens and say, if we’re doing this, you have to hold us accountable, because we’re telling you we don’t want to do this,” Williams said.

Fry ultimately voted for the resolution.

Campbell also voted against the measure. She said she didn’t feel comfortable voting for something that had “no teeth.”

“I just think it doesn’t have meat, it doesn’t make sense,” she said.

Williams argued that the council was setting a budget that would affect the city in the distant future.

“The decisions we make don’t end the day our term ends,” said Williams.

Source link

Leave a Reply